Pneumonectomy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer
Review Article

Pneumonectomy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Monica Casiraghi1, Lorenzo Spaggiari1,2

1Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; 2Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: None; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Dr. Monica Casiraghi, MD. Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via G. Ripamonti, 435 20141 Milan, Italy. Email: monica.casiraghi@ieo.it.

Abstract: Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer is a very heterogeneous group of patients and the different therapeutic approaches for IIIA-N2 disease are still debated in particular when pneumonectomy has to be performed considering the expected low long-term survival and the worse post-operative outcome. In literature, there are different studies and randomized trials comparing the results of pneumonectomy in patients with and without induction therapy, showing different outcomes. Although several studies favor a definitive chemo-radiotherapy treatment in patients with IIIA-pN2 non-small cell lung cancer, through our results and the literature was showed that pneumonectomy could be considered a valid surgical option in well-selected patients based on the acceptable long-term survival and the low rate of post-treatment morbidity.

Keywords: Pneumonectomy (PN); non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); chemotherapy


Received: 18 December 2019; Accepted: 22 January 2020; Published: 10 July 2020.

doi: 10.21037/shc.2020.02.04


Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a very heterogeneous group of patients with different therapeutic strategies and prognosis. “Resectable” N2-NSCLC patients could be candidate to surgery in case of stable or respondent disease to induction therapy (IT), with a good long-term survival (1-3). However, the different therapeutic approaches for IIIA-N2 disease are still very much debated between surgeons and oncologists, in particular when pneumonectomy (PN) has to be performed considering the expected low long-term survival and the worse post-operative outcome, in particular after IT. This highlights a substantial variability in the surgical and clinical management of those patients. Thus, patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC candidate to PN are often excluded from surgery and candidate to a more conservative approach such as definitive chemo-radiotherapy.

Even if the incidence of post-operative complications following PN dropped sharply compare to the past considering the new progresses in surgical technique and in post-operative care (4,5), PN is still considered a challenging procedure and its role remains controversial, due to the implemented use of multimodality approach in advanced stage lung cancer and the increased risk of surgical complications after IT ranging between 14% and 43% (6-9).

In literature (Table 1), there are different studies and randomized trials comparing the results of PN in patients with and without chemotherapy and showing different outcomes, mostly due to the different neoadjuvant therapies rather than the treatment strategy itself (6,7,10-14,16,17).

Table 1

review of the literature of patients underwent PN

Authors year (reference) Type of study N IT rate Morbidity 30-day mortality 5-year OS
Patel et al. 2002 (10) Abstract 115 45% 4% 18.8 months median OS
Van Schil et al. 2005 (11) Multicenter randomized trial 69 (all N2) 100% 9% only BPF 7%*
Gilligan et al. 2007 (12) Multicenter randomized trial 145 45% 7%; 10%* 4%; 5%*
Thomas et al. 2008 (13) Randomized trial 104 100% 33% 6%; 14%§
Albain et al. 2009 (6) Multicenter randomized trial 54 100% 26% 22%
Pisters et al. 2010 (7) Multicenter randomized trial 45 47% 0%; 17%*
Shapiro et al. 2010 (14) Retrospective, STS GTDB 1,002 27% 30% 5%
Thomas et al. 2015 (15) Retrospective, EPITHOR group 4,498 27% 33% 9%; 6%*
Broderick et al. 2016 (16) Retrospective 1,033 (866 cN2) 71% 0%; 8%* 31%; 33%*
Casiraghi et al. 2019 (17) Retrospective 233 (all N2) 64% 13%; 23%* 2%; 3%* 32%

*, after IT; §, after chemo-radiotherapy. PN, pneumonectomy; IT, induction therapy; STS GTDB, Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database; OS, overall survival; BPF, bronchopleural fistula.

American groups performed induction chemo-radiation therapy in 58.7% of the case according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, compare to only 8.2% of the European trials (French General Thoracic Surgery Database—EPHITOR) (14,15), and this could be the reason of the higher post-operative morbidity and mortality. The Southwest Oncology Group trial showed a 16.7% mortality rate in the PN group after IT compare to no mortality in the surgery-alone group; the outcomes were even worst in case of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (7). In the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (14) induction chemo-radiotherapy was an independent risk factor for major post-operative events after PN as well as in the INT 0139 trial (6), in which IIIA-pN2 patients undergoing PN after platinum-based induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy had a 25.9% 30-day mortality rate.

On the other hand, the European trials, such as the French Thoracic Cooperative Group (10) and the MRC LU22/NVALT 2/EORTC 08012 multicenter randomized trial (12), did not show any significant increasing in mortality rates after IT. In the EORTC 08941 trial, the 30-day mortality of PN after IT was 7% (11,18), similar to the 5.7% of the EPITHOR and even lower than the post-operative mortality of patients (8.6%) who did not have IT (15). Besides, the German Lung Cancer Cooperative Group showed a post-PN mortality after 3 cycles of cisplatin and etoposide of 6% compare to 14% of patients treated with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (13).

In our recent retrospective study (17) on 233 patients undergoing PN for N2 NSCLC, the 30-day and 90-day mortality rates was 2.5% and 8.8%, respectively, without any significant correlation to IT on survival, probably due to the fact the most of the patients had just induction chemotherapy, and only 6.1% concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. Even in our older studies, the post-PN (after IT) mortality was described to be below 5%, but up to 10% after extended PN, due to higher surgical (bronchopleural fistula) and respiratory complication rates (17,19). Kim et al. (20) recently published a meta-analysis showing a significantly higher mortality for right sided PN, up to 11% after IT, probably related to a higher likelihood of bronchopleural fistula.

Indeed, PN is often associated to major post-operative morbidity, especially after IT and right PN, such as respiratory complications and post-operative bronchopleural fistula, which are the major cause of dead in those patients. Thomas et al. (13) showed an overall postoperative complication rate of 33%, and a post-operative related mortality due to respiratory complications and bronchopleural fistula of 20.8% and 34%, respectively, mostly related to right-sided surgery more than IT.

In a study published by Patel in 2002, 115 patients undergoing PN, of which 52 patients (45%) after IT, had a 30-day mortality of 6% on the right side and 3% on the left side. Besides, IT was related to a higher risk of post-operative cardiac complications, but not to the incidence of bronchopleural fistulas. Their median survival was 18.5 months for the right-sided and 19.1 months for the left-sided interventions (10).

However, both in ours (17) and in other recent studies (13,21) major postoperative morbidity rate was considered acceptable after IT, even when induction chemo-radiotherapy was included. This could be probably related to the systematic use of vascularized flaps, in particular after right post induction PN, which reduced the incidence of bronchial stump fistula (6,17,21).

Besides, some retrospective studies described poorer outcome after PN, even without IT (22-25), compare to lobectomy due to the stage of the tumor (centrally located), and to the higher early mortality after surgery (25). Also, Spaggiari in 2016 (26), published a retrospective study on 141 patients with “potential” resectable stage IIIA-pN2 after IT, describing a slightly better survival in the lobectomy group compare to PN, even if not statistically significant.

Considering the long-term survival, Casiraghi et al. (17) showed a 3- and 5-year OS of 43.4% and 31.6%, respectively, with no difference in survival between patients undergoing IT and patients who did not. In particular, poorer prognosis was associated to the number of N2 stations and to the extended resection, suggesting the importance of a correct patients’ selection.

Broderick et al. (16) analyzed 1,033 patients stage IIIA NSCLC (886 patients clinical N2) from the National Cancer Database showing for the T1-T3N2 patients an overall 5-year survival of 29.4%, 31.3% in the neoadjuvant group compare to 24.8% in the adjuvant group. In particular, the author did not find any difference in survival between all stage IIIA patients treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemo-radiation, and the subset of IIIA patients with N2 disease.

In conclusion, although several studies favor a definitive CT/RT treatment in patients with IIIA-pN2 NSCLC, through our results and the literature was showed that PN could be considered a valid surgical option in fit patients based on the acceptable long-term survival and the low rate of post-treatment morbidity; however, patients who underwent extended resections with multiple N2 involvement had a poorer prognosis, emphasizing that an accurate patient selection should be a prerequisite for extended surgery.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Shanghai Chest for the series “The Role of Pneumonectomy in Thoracic Surgery in The Third Millennium”. The article has undergone external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/shc.2020.02.04). The series “The Role of Pneumonectomy in Thoracic Surgery in The Third Millennium” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. LS served as the unpaid Guest Editors of the series and serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Shanghai Chest from Aug 2019 to Jul 2021. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Lorent N, De Leyn P, Lievens Y, et al. Long-term survival of surgically staged IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer treated with surgical combined modality approach: Analysis of a 7-year prospective experience. Ann Oncol 2004;15:1645-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Betticher DC, Hsu Schmitz SF, Tötsch M, et al. Mediastinal lymph node clearance after docetaxel-cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy is prognostic of survival in patients with stage IIIA pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1752-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Eberhardt W, Wilke H, Stamatis G, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy based on hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy and definitive surgery in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Mature results of a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:622-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Ichiki Y, Nagashima A, Chikaishi Y, et al. Pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Today 2012;42:830-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Licker M, Spiliopoulos A, Frey JG, et al. Risk factors for early mortality and major complications following pneumonectomy for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Chest 2002;121:1890-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, et al. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:379-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Pisters KM, Vallières E, Crowley JJ, et al. Surgery with or without preoperative paclitaxel and carboplatin in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Trial S9900, an intergroup, randomized, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1843-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. De Leyn P, Dooms C, Kuzdzal J, et al. Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;45:787-98. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Daly BD, Fernando HC, Ketchedjian A, et al. Pneumonectomy after high-dose radiation and concurrent chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:227-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Patel AN, Luketich JD, Fernando HC, et al. Morbidity of pneumonectomy in the age of neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:abstr 7176.
  11. Van Schil P, Van Meerbeeck J, Kramer G, et al. Morbidity and mortality in the surgery arm of EORTC 08941 trial. Eur Respir J 2005;26:192-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Gilligan D, Nicolson M, Smith I, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: results of the MRC LU22/NVALT 2/EORTC 08012 multicentre randomised trial and update of systematic review. Lancet 2007;369:1929-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Thomas M, Rübe C, Hoffknecht P, et al. Effect of preoperative chemoradiation in addition to preoperative chemotherapy: a randomised trial in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:636-48. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Shapiro M, Swanson SJ, Wright CD, et al. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy utilizing the Society for Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:927-34; discussion 934-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Thomas PA, Berbis J, Baste JM, et al. Pneumonectomy for lung cancer: contemporary national early morbidity and mortality outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:73-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Broderick SR, Patel AP, Crabtree TD, et al. Pneumonectomy for Clinical Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:451-7; discussion 457-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Casiraghi M, Guarize J, Sandri A, et al. Pneumonectomy in Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC: Should It Be Considered After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Clin Lung Cancer 2019;20:97-106.e1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. van Meerbeeck JP, Kramer GW, Van Schil PE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:442-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Leo F, Solli PG, Veronesi G, et al. Does chemotherapy increase the risk of respiratory complications after pneumonectomy? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:519-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Kim AW, Boffa DJ, Wang Z, et al. An analysis, systematic review, and meta-analysis of the perioperative mortality after neoadjuvant therapy and pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:55-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Venuta F, Anile M, Diso D, et al. Operative complications and early mortality after induction therapy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:714-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Duque JL, Ramos G, Castrodeza J, et al. Early complications in surgical treatment of lung cancer: A prospective, multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:944-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Myrdal G, Gustafsson G, Lambe M, et al. Outcome after lung cancer surgery. Factors predicting early mortality and major morbidity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:694-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Wada H, Nakamura T, Nakamoto K, et al. Thirty-day operative mortality for thoracotomy in lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:70-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Kappers I, van Sandick JW, Burgers SA, et al. Surgery after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: Why pneumonectomy should be avoided. Lung Cancer 2010;68:222-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Spaggiari L, Casiraghi M, Guarize J, et al. Outcome of Patients With pN2 “Potentially Resectable” Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Who Underwent Surgery After Induction Chemotherapy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;28:593-602. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/shc.2020.02.04
Cite this article as: Casiraghi M, Spaggiari L. Pneumonectomy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Shanghai Chest 2020;4:30.

Download Citation